Actually, this idea is not as wacky as you're suggesting. Laurent Nottale
suggested something like this with his Fractal Spacetime theory,
essentially explaining standard QM geometrically as a projection from a higher
dimension Hausdorf space (fractal dimension).

His ideas haven't gained traction, alas - not because they've been
proven wrong, as I understand - he just seems to have been ignored by
the mainstream.

Cheers

On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 04:04:14AM +0000, Colin Geoffrey Hales wrote:
> Colin's Wackier Version:
> 
> Because the space they operate in, at the scale in which the decay operates, 
> there are far more dimensions than 3. They decay deterministically in >>3D 
> and it appears, to us, to be random because of the collapse of the spatial 
> dimensions to 3, where we humble observers gain access to it. Same reason 
> atoms jiggle in space. Same reason an electron is fuzzy. Smoothness in >>3D 
> looks fuzzy to us.
> 
> Quantum mechanics is a statistical description that is predictive in 3D. It 
> explains nothing.
> 
> I offer explanation, not description.
> 
> :)
> 
> 
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Craig Weinberg
> Sent: Wednesday, 10 April 2013 1:19 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Why do particles decay randomly?
> 
> 
> 
> On Tuesday, April 9, 2013 7:54:27 PM UTC-4, Russell Standish wrote:
> It is hard to answer this question precisely, because the large,
> radioactive nuclei are very complex structures, for which exact solutions of
> Schroedinger's equation cannot be obtained. Rather these things are
> usually studied via Hartree-Fock approximations.
> 
> However, in loose visual terms, you can think of a neutron as being in
> a superposition of states, some of which are an electron-proton pair
> separated by a substantial distance. If the electron finds itself too
> far from its partner proton, the weak force is too weak, and the
> electric force is shielded by the orbital electrons, so the electron
> escapes, becoming the beta ray. This explanation has left out an
> obvious factor - an anti-neutrino must also be created as part of the
> process. This is often explained as being required to preserve lepton
> number - but conservation of lepton number is a somewhat ad hoc law - I
> don't know the real physical reason why lepton number is conserved.
> 
> Anyway, the point of randomness is that this is a quintessential
> quantum process, very closely related to the phenomenon of quantum
> tunneling. Unless there exists a hidden variable-type theory
> underlying QM (which basically appears to be ruled out by
> Bell+Aspect), the process must be completely random.
> 
> I wonder if we looked at the behavior of cars driving on the highway, would 
> we conclude that the variation in how long they travel before exiting the 
> highway must be completely random? Maybe the hidden variable is that matter 
> knows what it is doing?
> 
> Craig
> 
> 
> Cheers
> 
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 05:57:11AM -0700, Craig Weinberg wrote:
> > If any particle were truly identical to another, then they could not decay
> > at different rates. While we see this as "random" (aka spontaneous to our
> > eyes), there is nothing to say that the duration of the life of the
> > particle is not influenced by intentional dispositions. Particles may
> > represent different intensities of 'will to continue' or expectation of
> > persistence. In this sense, organic molecules could represent a Goldilocks
> > range of time-entangled panpsychism which is particularly flexible and
> > dynamic. Think of the lifetime of a molecular ensemble as the length of a
> > word in a sentence as it relates to the possibilities of meaning. Too long
> > and it becomes unwieldy, too brief and it becomes generic.
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "Everything List" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> > email to [email protected]<javascript:>.
> > To post to this group, send email to 
> > [email protected]<javascript:>.
> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> >
> >
> 
> --
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Prof Russell Standish                  Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
> Principal, High Performance Coders
> Visiting Professor of Mathematics      [email protected]<javascript:>
> University of New South Wales          http://www.hpcoders.com.au
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to 
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
> To post to this group, send email to 
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> 
> 

-- 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prof Russell Standish                  Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting Professor of Mathematics      [email protected]
University of New South Wales          http://www.hpcoders.com.au
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to