On 8 December 2013 11:58, John Mikes <[email protected]> wrote: > Telmo asked: > > *Honest question: isn't "dark matter" a fancy name for failed predictions?* > > *I would not be so rude * - just call it an ingenious way to save our > scientific face in so far developed conventional science. > Then it required 'dark energy' in the dark minds.And ALL had been > justified by the theories to be justified. > John M > > We shouldn't be surprised there is stuff out there we can't see. Observation has already revealed a whole bunch of stuff we couldn't detect as little as a century ago, what are the chances we can see the whole Hubble Schmeer yet?
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
