On 8 December 2013 11:58, John Mikes <jami...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Telmo asked:
> *Honest question: isn't "dark matter" a fancy name for failed predictions?*
> *I would not be so rude * - just call it an ingenious way to save our
> scientific face in so far developed conventional science.
> Then it required 'dark energy' in the dark minds.And ALL had been
> justified by the theories to be justified.
> John M
> We shouldn't be surprised there is stuff out there we can't see.
Observation has already revealed a whole bunch of stuff we couldn't detect
as little as a century ago, what are the chances we can see the whole
Hubble Schmeer yet?

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to