On 28 December 2013 16:26, Jason Resch <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Edgar L. Owen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Jason, >> >> Answers to your 3 questions. >> >> 1. No. >> > > If there are no faster-than-light (FTL) influences, then how does your > interpretation address the EPR paradox ( > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPR_paradox )? As a previously mentioned, > according to Bell's theorem, there is only one known solution to the > paradox that does not involve FTL influences, and that is Everett's theory > of many-worlds. > > Huw Price's time symmetry also solves the paradox. Bell agreed with him on this, so I think it's probably a valid result even if not widely known. I'm not sure that Price's ontology is intended as a "rival" to Everett, however, although it may introduce modifications.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
