On 22 January 2014 14:35, Russell Standish <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 02:23:12PM +1300, LizR wrote: > > On 22 January 2014 14:24, Russell Standish <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > No - that it is consistent with oneself, as an observer. Why couldn't > > > we be a disembodied observer playing a virtual reality game? A p-ghost > > > as someone put it recently. > > > > > > Do you mean consistent with (apparently) having a body, and > (apparently) > > being immersed in a universe that (more or less) makes sense? > > Basically that's it! > Phew, I got there in the end :) I can only assume that having an (apparent) body etc is more probable than being a disembodied p-ghost, but explaining this in comp (or any "Theory of Nothing") sounds like it may be a measure problem over an infinite set. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
