On 26 January 2014 16:27, Stephen Paul King <[email protected]>wrote:
> Dear LizR, > > I try to (have some idea what I am talking about). I just have lost the > desire to explain myself. I made my case already. > Well, OK, fine by me. I didn't see a case made, only a definition / ontological assumption, which I was attempting to clarify. I guess if I had time to read that paper (and all the others that get linked) I might have had a better idea of what backs up this definition: I am trying to not get stuck on the classical notion of time and instead focus on what the concept is trying to denote: 1) a sequence of events 2) a transition from one event to another. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
