Without hijacking this massive thread, I am asking if it is worth buying
this book, if you are not a believer in the platonic universe, UDA,etc?
Ronald
On Saturday, January 25, 2014 10:31:25 PM UTC-5, Liz R wrote:
>
> On 26 January 2014 16:27, Stephen Paul King
> <[email protected]<javascript:>
> > wrote:
>
>> Dear LizR,
>>
>> I try to (have some idea what I am talking about). I just have lost the
>> desire to explain myself. I made my case already.
>>
>
> Well, OK, fine by me. I didn't see a case made, only a definition /
> ontological assumption, which I was attempting to clarify. I guess if I had
> time to read that paper (and all the others that get linked) I might have
> had a better idea of what backs up this definition:
>
> I am trying to not get stuck on the classical notion of time and
> instead focus on what the concept is trying to denote:
> 1) a sequence of events
> 2) a transition from one event to another.
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
