Without hijacking this massive thread, I am asking if it is worth buying
this book, if you are not a believer in the platonic universe, UDA,etc?
Ronald
On Saturday, January 25, 2014 10:31:25 PM UTC-5, Liz R wrote:
>
> On 26 January 2014 16:27, Stephen Paul King
> <step...@provensecure.com<javascript:>
> > wrote:
>
>> Dear LizR,
>>
>> I try to (have some idea what I am talking about). I just have lost the
>> desire to explain myself. I made my case already.
>>
>
> Well, OK, fine by me. I didn't see a case made, only a definition /
> ontological assumption, which I was attempting to clarify. I guess if I had
> time to read that paper (and all the others that get linked) I might have
> had a better idea of what backs up this definition:
>
> I am trying to not get stuck on the classical notion of time and
> instead focus on what the concept is trying to denote:
> 1) a sequence of events
> 2) a transition from one event to another.
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
