On 1/28/2014 1:16 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
That would be like attributing importance to a name, at a place where precisely we should not attribute any importance. I would use "tao", that would make the results looking new-age. Use any another name, people will add more connotations than with the concept of god, and its quasi-name God for the monist or monotheist big unique being or beyond being entity.
If I show it is empirically false that "Use any another name, people will add more connotations than with the concept of god," will you stop using "God" and switch to "goar"?
Brent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
