On 30 January 2014 10:28, Russell Standish <[email protected]> wrote:
> As someone pointed out, it requires a non-standard definition of > convergence, as these series are non-convergent according to the usual > Cauchy definition. > Surely they are non convergent full stop? But even so I can't offhand see what's wrong with my son's proof that the series sums to 1/2 (a couple of posts back). It doesn't seem to require convergence...??? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
