On 8 February 2014 17:16, <[email protected]> wrote: > > Purely in the sense of how many moments there has been since the big bang, > allowing that every piece of energy in the universe (appropriately > nodding at dark energy) has its own unbroken history back to it. By > whatever measure of a 'moment' we like, shouldn't they all be resolvable in > terms of their history to the same number of moments SAVE for some 'edge' > right at the furthest extent where history is the longest time, where we > allow that relativistic and other inbalances are yet to resolve? >
I don't think so. Massive objects will have experienced gravitational time dilation relative to gas-filled voids, for example. A neutron star formed early in the history of the universe will be rather younger (in terms of time since the big bang) than the Earth, for example. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
