Liz, No 5D embedding space. The rate of expansion is just the intrinsic processor cycle 'rate'. The only real measure of that is how it manifests in the computations it produces because only they have any measure because only they have dimensionality. Again whenever we try to measure p-timel we end up measuring only what it has computed because only what it computes has measure including all measuring sticks, clocks and devices. P-time computes all dimensionality, and all measuring devices. Thus those measuring devices only measure other things that have been computed, not the p-time that computes them all.
Thus when I speak of a processor 'rate', it's only an illustrative analogy because that rate has no direct measure. The only glimpse we get of it is in the minimal quanta of time measured in clock time, and presumably the curvature of the universe. So in clock time terms the p-time processor cycle must be very short, on the scale of what scientists misleadingly call the Planck time scale. The p-time processor rate must obviously be fast enough to compute all events in clock time, so in CLOCK time measures, the duration of a p-time processor cycle must be shorter than the shortest clock time event. Edgar On Friday, February 7, 2014 9:40:08 PM UTC-5, Liz R wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 03:57:47PM -0800, Edgar L. Owen wrote: >> > Ghibbsa, >> > >> > Let me clarify my previous answer a little. >> > >> > P-time runs at the same intrinsic rate everywhere in the universe >> though it >> > doesn't really have a 'rate' in the usual sense since it's prior to >> > dimensionality. However that rate is the speed at which the p-time >> radial >> > dimension of the hyperspherical universe extends. That extension >> actually >> > is or produces or generates the 'flow' of p-time. >> >> If you can assign a speed to the expansion of the hypothetical > hypersphere, then you have assumed an external space-time in which it is > expanding, so that "speed" means something (distance/time). So you are > assuming an extra 5D space-time in order to have something in which the 4D > universe is expanding, including a time dimension... How is this prior to > dimensionality? > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
