Sounds (vaguely) similar to Fred Pohl's "A Plague of Pythons".

On 24 February 2014 20:14, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 2/23/2014 10:21 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
>
>> On 24 February 2014 16:49, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/23/2014 9:26 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 24 February 2014 11:45, David Nyman <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 23 February 2014 17:27, Stathis Papaioannou <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  John Searle in one of his papers proposes that if our brain were being
>>>>>> gradually replaced we would find ourselves losing qualia while
>>>>>> declaring
>>>>>> that everything was normal, and being unable to make any protest to
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> contrary.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Replaced with what though? I assume he must stipulate non-biological
>>>>> components that supposedly replicate brain "function", although I would
>>>>> guess that the idea of a substitution level hasn't occurred to him
>>>>> explicitly. That said, the idea seems preposterous on its face.
>>>>>
>>>> Replacement with computer chips, which he agrees is at least
>>>> theoretically possible.
>>>>
>>>>  This would imply that we think with something other than our brain, a
>>>>>> soul
>>>>>> equivalent, and that in certain situations the brain and this soul
>>>>>> equivalent can become decoupled.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes it would seem to imply that. I'd never realised that Searle would
>>>>> infer
>>>>> anything like that on the basis of his so-called biological naturalism.
>>>>> Mind
>>>>> you, since he is at least implicitly a materialist, I never had much
>>>>> of a
>>>>> clue what he meant in appealing to some unspecified non-functional
>>>>> "causal
>>>>> power" of the brain to produce consciousness. AFAIK he never elaborated
>>>>> this
>>>>> beyond a brute stipulation that this is how the brain can bypass his
>>>>> no-semantics-from-syntax prohibition (something like the brain produces
>>>>> consciousness like the liver produces bile).
>>>>>
>>>> I found the quote, from Searle, J. 1992 The Rediscovery of Mind
>>>> (Cambridge, Mass : The MIT Press,
>>>> Bradford Books):
>>>>
>>>> "As the silicon is progressively implanted into your dwindling brain,
>>>> you
>>>> find that the area of your conscious experience is shrinking, but that
>>>> this
>>>> shows no effect on your external behavior. You find, to your total
>>>> amazement, that you are indeed losing control of your external behavior.
>>>> You find, for example, that when the doctors test your vision, you hear
>>>> them say, "We are holding up a red object in front of you; please tell
>>>> us
>>>> what you see." You want to cry out, "I can't see anything. I'm going
>>>> totally
>>>> blind." But you hear your voice saying in a way that is completely out
>>>> of
>>>> your
>>>> control, "I see a red object in front of me".
>>>>
>>>
>>> Greg Egan wrote a short story "The Jewel" on this theme. At maturity,
>>> before
>>> one's brain starts to deteriorate, everyone has their brain replaces by a
>>> "jewel" that encodes and functionally replaces their brain but which will
>>> not deteriorate with age.  Of course, in the story, the subject
>>> discovers he
>>> is conscious but has no control over his body and he here's himself
>>> telling
>>> people that he is conscious just as before and there's been no change.
>>>  So
>>> really the story idea is that the original consciousness loses control of
>>> the body but continues to perceive and to think a narrative life story
>>> which
>>> it remembers.  Since everyone who has the operation to install a "jewel"
>>> reports that it works perfectly, everyone continues to volunteer for the
>>> replacement.
>>>
>>> Brent
>>>
>> That's possible if the "jewel" is an adjunct rather than a
>> replacement, for otherwise what is doing the thinking if the original
>> brain is gone?
>>
>
> ?? Per the story, the "jewel" takes over all function, but the brain
> remains - just along for the ride as it were.  But no one reports this.
>  It's like an unzombie - a being that acts perfectly normally, but has an
> extra (? it's not clear in the story whether the "jewel" is conscious)
> consciousness in the sense of an internal narrative.
>
> Brent
>
>
>
>>
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to