He's talking about the fact that you get about 50% 0s and 50% 1s ... as we
were discussing recently. I trust this clears up any lingering doubts about
what he meant by this.


On 23 March 2014 18:50, Russell Standish <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 11:27:13PM -0800, meekerdb wrote:
> > Here's Max! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PC0zHIf2Gkw
> >
> > Brent
> >
>
> Thanks for that. One thing that struck me was how ordinary the FPI
> argument (UDA step 3) seems when Max talks about it. But also how it
> generalises to unequal probabilities - which was the thrust of that
> paper we discussed here a couple of years ago - in generating the Born
> rule from counting arguments.
>
> Cheers
>
>
> --
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Prof Russell Standish                  Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
> Principal, High Performance Coders
> Visiting Professor of Mathematics      [email protected]
> University of New South Wales          http://www.hpcoders.com.au
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to