Telmo and Liz:

Conspiracy <theory> my foot. It cuts into profits. Moloch is talking.

Gullibility (even the negative one) is based on ignorance, when I first
heard about the "global warming" threat (~ 30 years ago) I joked:
'my climate-log is incomplete for the past 30 (300?) million years',
 so I reserved my opinion' until I got more info realizing that recent
societal activity (industrial included) contributes to the greenhouse
effect vastly. Then I changed my position and became a fighter against Big
Money nonchallantly ruining the Earth for the profit in polluting freely.

Best: John M


On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 6:30 AM, Telmo Menezes <[email protected]>wrote:

>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 11:47 AM, LizR <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> That doesn't narrow it down too much.
>>
>
> Je m'accuse. I was one of them.
>
> My point was that conspiracy theories, in the sense of power elites
> secretly cooperating to further their own interests against the interests
> of the majority are not, unfortunately, unusual events in History. We know
> of countless examples of this happening in the past. I think it requires
> some magical thinking to assume that this type of behaviour is absent from
> our own times.
>
> I further pointed out that broadly discrediting any hypothesis that some
> elites might be conspiring against the common good, in broad strokes, seems
> to benefit precisely the ones in power. Furthermore, thanks to Snowden, we
> now have strong evidence of a large-scale conspiracy by western governments
> that I would not believe one year ago. In this case I'm referring to the
> secret implementation of global and total surveillance, with our tax money,
> by the people we elected, to spy on us, infringing on constitutions.
>
> I can't help but notice the very common rhetorical trick of using the
> nutty conspiracy theories (UFOs, the Illuminati, fake moon landing, etc.)
> to discredit the much more mundane and reasonable suspicions of elites
> abusing their power. The paper you cite in this thread uses that trick too.
>
> This broad denial of the existence of conspiracies is silly, if you think
> about it. The official explanation for 9/11 is a conspiracy theory: some
> religious arab fundamentalists conspired to create a global network of
> terrorist cells with the objective of attacking western civilisation. They
> hijacked planes and sent them into buildings and so on. If you don't
> believe in this explanation, you are then forced to believe in some other
> conspiracy.
>
> Of course conspiracies exist. The current denial of this quite obvious
> fact feels Orwellian, to be honest.
>
> Best,
> Telmo.
>
>
>>
>>
>> On 5 April 2014 22:31, Quentin Anciaux <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> It was in one of the climate threads.
>>> Le 5 avr. 2014 09:11, "LizR" <[email protected]> a écrit :
>>>
>>>>  On 4 April 2014 19:35, Quentin Anciaux <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> 2014-04-04 1:29 GMT+02:00 LizR <[email protected]>:
>>>>>
>>>>> "Climate Deniers Intimidate Journal into Retracting Paper that Finds
>>>>>> They Believe Conspiracy Theories"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ironically, it looks like they are conspiring to silence any mention
>>>>>> of this fact!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/climate-deniers-intimidate-journal-into-retracting-paper-that-finds-they-believe-conspiracy-theories
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PS I know this isn't about "everything" but there seems to be some
>>>>>> interest in this topic on this forum.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  It is strange, because when I did mention that here, the answer was
>>>>> that it was perfectly normal and rational to believe in global conspiracy
>>>>> theories and irrational not to.
>>>>>
>>>>> That sounds a slightly strange view, imho. Who said that, may I ask,
>>>> and in what context?
>>>>
>>>> (I will be sending my ninja assassins round to deal with them later, as
>>>> per the standing instructions of the Grand High Adepts of the 
>>>> Illuminati...)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>  --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to