On 11 May 2014 20:07, Alberto G. Corona <[email protected]> wrote:

> For a  greedy reductionist, the emergence of some higher level should mean
> that the bottom level has "found" a new way to influence itself with new
> emergent laws that consider wider aggregations of matter and time. But that
> is indistinguishable from non reductionist emergence.
>
> I think that's "weak" emergence?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to