I'm going to bullet point the key, hard-to-vary, components that may or may 
not result in falsification. In doing so, I will be stating not my personal 
preference, but the long standing convention. In light of this faithfulness 
simply to what it actually is, I feel a little aggrieved by the stream of 
unrelenting dismissiveness, resorts to claims of unintelligibility on my 
part, allegations of ill motivation, irrelevance and the rest of it. 
 
So I will bullet point it here, very briefly. And if the same individuals 
want to continue the way they are going, I shall suggest they put their 
money where their mouths are, and lay cash wager which one of us is 
correct, and we shall take our dispute to some of the major and 
esteemed leading scientists of our time. And then we shall see. 
 
Falsification. 
 
1. A precise, non-trivial prediction must be found in a theory, with the 
following two key characteristics: It says something NEW about the 
world, that goes over and above an Explanation of that which we 
already know. Second, that it may be formulated with complete separation 
and independence from the theory from which it spawns, and stated entirely 
within the pre-existing realm of the incumbent hard won knowledge already 
in place. This is the first layer of separation. The theory from the 
prediction, the prediction in terms of the incumbent theory of the world. 
 
2. Second. The theorist has no SAY, more than any other person,  in how the 
prediction will be tested. The end to end process encapsulating all 
components involved in the eventual lead up to an observation event, is 
ENTIRELY outside the theory and the argumentations of the theorist. This is 
the second layer of separation,. 
 
3. Third, an even higher level of separation must be met, between the two 
strands of science, on the one side being the source of the prediction and 
on the other the source of the observation. As such, two distinctive 
paradigms of science are necessary. If one is theory deriving, the other is 
technological. If one is human creative, the other is empirical. If one 
field produces the prediction, another field tests the prediction. Like 
Physics, and astronomy. 
 
This is the multifolding degrees of separation that set us free from our 
own delusions and dreams and imagings, that had dominated our condition 
since the dawn of our and made us prisoners in palaces of ignorance which 
no human had ever broken free of. It was only with this, this extreme 
dedication to not believing a word of our own sayings, and trusting to 
no-one that they could know let alone control the huge assumptions we all 
would be sneaking through, without even knowing it, where there not these 
multiple layers of separation for the first time...maybe in the whole 
universe....set a kind free and opened an age of objective discovery. 
 
This matters. A lot. To everyone, all humans. It matters when someone 
misconceives this fundamemental bedrock of science. It isn't ok for people 
to make up their own meanings for falsification. It isn't virtuous at all 
to write free passes. Because we could actually this precious beautiful 
thing. And then all we would have is what we had before. Dreams and 
delusions and priests and medicine men, and nothing that ever took root and 
grew. 
 
So I am passion for this. I love science. I am loyal to science. I'm fine 
with comp and whatever else anyone wants to believe. But let's remember and 
allow ourselves to be reminded what is fundamental to the scientific 
revolution. If someone needs to relearn the nature and distinctiveness of 
falsification, there's no shame in that. But it isn't right to make our own 
versions up, and say its the same, when it's stripped of the hard-to-vary 
fundamental character of separation
 
Let's lay bets if that's what it'll  take. If Bruno stands by his claims to 
falsifiability and the definitions he has attached to falsifiability. Let's 
go to it..we can go all the way. Let's see what leading scientific minds of 
our day think it is. 
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to