When a discipline spend so much time in vacuous definitions, it is not a good sign.
iWho knows maybe the next year a new gender studies on planetary bodies would help with some new recomendations 2014-05-28 16:58 GMT+02:00, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be>: > > On 28 May 2014, at 02:35, LizR wrote: > >> Pluto Bids To Get Back Planetary Status >> >> Pluto has at least five moons, an atmosphere and now a new analysis >> places its diameter as bigger than its outer solar system rival Eris. >> >> http://www.scientificamerican.com/podcast/episode/pluto-bids-for-planethood/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter >> >> > > Good news! > > I have never really understood the disgrace of Pluto. > > To me, something big enough and quasi-spherical, and heavy enough to > go around a star, is a planet enough. > > I know that definition might made the number of Solar Planets very > big, but in the everything list that should not be a problem. How > many? About 2014 I think :) > > Bruno > > > http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Alberto. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
