On 7 June 2014 14:00, John Ross <[email protected]> wrote: > > If you think back in time long enough before there was anything anywhere > you > get to a point in time when there was nothing. Somehow nothing turned into > something and that something or some things ultimately turned into our > Universe. My theory suggests a logical answer for how this could have > happened. >
(Well, according to eternal inflation that didn't happen anyway, but that's still rather speculative...) But in any case, if one wants to know "why is there something rather than nothing?" one should also ask "why are there even laws of physics?" So how does your model account for the existence of physics, and how does it account for the existence of the universe? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
