On 25 June 2014 05:07, John Ross <[email protected]> wrote: > “So what”. My point is you cannot prove Einstein’s relativity theories > are correct by citing small variations in the ticking of clocks. >
You can't prove any theory is correct by any observation, you can only disprove theories. In this case the point is that the variations in clock rates are consistent with the theory that time dilation occurs (some of the variations are huge, in the case of particles in accelerators). > > > You know of at least two explanations of gravity: Einstein’s and mine. I > assume you have read my Chapter XX, “Black Holes and Gravity”. My > explanation is enormously simpler than Albert’s. > > > It isn't a theory, only a hunch, until you provide equations and show their derivation. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
