Thanks for your serious questions. The answers are simple.
· There is no “strong force”. Strong forces do hold atomic nuclei together. These forces are all Coulomb forces. According to Coulomb’s Law, as the distance between charged particles approach zero the forces between them approach infinity. Now an infinite force would be a “strong” force. · Forces between alpha particles (with a net charge of plus two) are repulsive at long range. At a zero range the forces are also repulsive. In between the forces between alpha exactly balance at a particular distance in many configurations, but certainly not all. That is why the nuclei of carbon-12, oxygen-16, neon-20 etc. are stable. Two alpha particles close together are stable for only an extremely short period of time in beryllium-4 which decays into two alpha particles. For Be-4 there is no perfect distance where attractive and repulsive forces balance. · My theory accounts for everything that I have put it to test on. My entron (which is two tronnies circling at diameters that range from about 0.9339 X 10-18 m to a few centimeters) does the job that the Higgs Boson is suppose to do. That is, provide mass to other particles. The entron provides all of the mass in our Universe except for the masses of the electron and the positron. There is one entron in each photon. (All our brilliant scientist need to do is open their eyes to see millions of particles that provide mass to other particles.) When you are lying in the sun soaking up photons from the sun, your mass increased slightly with each photon absorbed. You lose a little mass when infrared entrons radiate out of your body as infrared and millimeter wave photons. There is no Higgs Boson. Billions are being spent on a wild goose chase. Entrons are describe in Chapter III. · My model does not include quarks; however, I explain in Chapter VIII the internal structure of the proton. The structure of neutrons are described in Chapter XII. No quarks are needed. · As to cosmic rays and colliders, I am aware of nothing that indicates to me that the experimental evidence is inconsistent with my model. Some of the interpretations are inconsistent. John R. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of meekerdb Sent: Friday, June 06, 2014 9:05 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: TRONNIES - SPACE On 6/6/2014 7:54 PM, LizR wrote: On 7 June 2014 14:00, John Ross <[email protected]> wrote: If you had a copy of my book you would see that the center portion of the alpha is comprised of four circling protons and two electrons are circling the path of the four protons, so the alpha particle is positive on the inside and negative on the outside. (FIG 11 ON PAGE 97 is a drawing of an alpha particle.) The result is that the combination of two alpha particles is extremely unstable, but the combinations of 3 through 10 alpha particles are all totally stable. In these nuclei the four positive protons in the center of the alpha is attracted to the two electrons in outside portion of its neighbor alpha particle. So, for example in the carbon-12 nucleus, at the right distances the attractive Coulomb forces in the three alpha particles exactly balance the repulsive coulomb forces, so carbon-12 is stable. NO STRONG FORCE NEEDED! So doesn't the strong force account for anything else? (Honest question, I don't know if there is any other need for it apart from holding nuclei together). But the strong force needs to be short range while the EM force is long range. Otherwise, even if there were and equilibrium point, a nucleus wouldn't be stable. Brent Does your model account for what happens in high energy collisions between nuclei, as for example in a collider or when a cosmic ray enters the atmosphere? I believe that stuff involves quark jets and production of various short lived particles (e.g. the Higgs boson) and all sorts of other stuff that is explained quite well by the existing model. Have you examined any of this any can you similarly account for it? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
