My model provides an explanation of everything including gravity which I understand is not explained by QM. QM does not explain logically why electrons do not blow themselves apart. I don't believe in quantum weirdness. There is a universe.
John Ross > > On 12 Jun 2014, at 18:51, [email protected] wrote: > >> I don't see how consciousness is important is describing how our >> Universe >> was created and how it works. Our Universe existed for billions of >> years >> before there was intelligent life to be conscious. > > IF there is a universe. We don't know that. But we do know that the > computations exists in arithmetic, and that from the machine's points > of view, an infinity of universal machines competes to continue them, > below our substitution level. It explains intuitively and formally > some quantum weirdness. > > > > >> >> Quantum mechanics is ok so long as it is consistent with my model. > > If the people are not happy, change the people! (Stalin, I think). > > If my theory does not fit nature, change nature! > > QM is not just positively confirmed since a long time, but it is > confirmed in its most startling aspects. > > It is also the only theory which makes sense of liquid, solid, gaz, > atoms and molecules, stars and black holes, particles and their > relations (bosons, fermions, fractional spins, condensed states theory). > > > > > > > > > >> My >> theory includes an explanation of the results of the two-slit >> experiment. > > > If is not a MW theory, or a "Many Dream" theory, I am afraid you will > need non local indeterminist sort of magic. > > Bruno > > > > > > > > > >>> >>> On 07 Jun 2014, at 22:18, John Ross wrote: >>> >>>> I do not explain consciousness. >>> >>> Fair enough. You are not searching to explain "everything". >>> Unfortunately, consciousness has something to say on the very origin >>> of the beliefs in the physical laws. You are still an Aristotelian >>> theologian (taking matter for primitive or granted with the naive >>> identity relation (brain/mind)). To defend that relation, between >>> brain and mind, you will need some special sort of actual infinities. >>> With the thesis that a brain (or body) is Turing emulable, you can >>> still attach consciousness to a brain, but you cannot attach a brain >>> to consciousness, you can only attach an infinity of relative >>> universal machine states to a consciousness. This might explain the >>> many-world aspect of quantum mechanics. It is not yet clear to me >>> what >>> is your position on quantum mechanics, or your explanation of the two >>> slits experiment. >>> >>> Bruno >>> >>>> >>>> Jr >>>> >>>> From: [email protected] >>>> [mailto:[email protected] >>>> ] On Behalf Of LizR >>>> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2014 6:02 PM >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: TRONNIES - SPACE >>>> >>>> On 7 June 2014 04:12, John Ross <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> There is a theory of everything - my theory, "The Ross Model". You >>>> are a smart person and you are extremely interested in this subject, >>>> so sooner or later you will get around to reading my book. And I >>>> predict you will be forced to agree with me. >>>> >>>> I haven't yet managed to discover what the ontology of the RM is - >>>> is the idea "primitive materialism" - that space, time, matter and >>>> energy are fundamental? Do you attempt to explain consciousness? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "Everything List" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >>>> . >>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "Everything List" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >>>> . >>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >>> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups >>> "Everything List" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>> send an >>> email to [email protected]. >>> To post to this group, send email to everything- >>> [email protected]. >>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Everything List" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >> send an email to [email protected]. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
