On 16 June 2014 12:14, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote: > Why does it show that rather than the success of our invention. You seem > determined to look at the result only in one way. >
Because that's the way that accords with our science-based experience about the world, yes. > I'd say what we discover is which description's work with which phenomena. > Yes, so would I, which is how we discover the laws of physics. We don't invent them. "Invent" implies we made something new, created something that might never otherwise have existed. But the laws of physics don't fall into that category. If you keep using "invent" to mean "discover" you are just blurring a useful distinction for no good reason. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
