Richard, that's a one to many situation you have dug up. The audits by IRS against conservatives are deliberate and politically motivated. Your side is out to defeat it's political enemies, just as Nixon tried to so many years ago.
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/video/irs-tea-party-conservative-groups-scandal-now-center-19182163 http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/05/14/irs-gave-progressives-a-pass-tea-party-groups-put-on-hold/2159983/ The FBI used by BHO and company- http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/20/doj-fox-news-james-rosen_n_3307422.html http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/DC-Decoder/2013/0520/Obama-administration-targets-Fox-News-reporter-in-chilling-echo-of-AP-probe-video NSA Spying on everyone, especially Americans- http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/mar/30/no-more-nsa-spying-obama-not-true https://www.aclu.org/secure/sem-reclaim-your-privacy-stand-aclu-today?s_src=UNW140001SEM&ms=gad_SEM_Google_Search-VerizonNSA_na_national%20security%20agency%20spying_b_42474621982 Militarizing of US Federal Agencies? Why does EPA or USDA need a SWAT team? Who are these teams and weapons and ammo being saved for, a Bolivian invasion? http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/12/06/1042835/-Why-is-the-Federal-Government-Militarizing-our-Police-Departments# http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-04-21/why-is-the-post-office-buying-bullets My comments were cause and effect, Richard, and not howling emotions. I used to be a Democrat, till I feared for US survival. -----Original Message----- From: Richard Ruquist <[email protected]> To: everything-list <[email protected]> Sent: Wed, Jun 25, 2014 6:24 am Subject: Re: American Intelligence Spud: Specifically, it's the use of auditing conservative groups, using the US IRS, and never, not once, auditing liberal groups; and this by the admission of the heads of the IRS. RR: Untrue. As of last year the only org to lose their tax exempt status was a liberal org from Maine http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/meet_the_group_the_irs_actually_revoked_democrats/ On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 6:11 AM, spudboy100 via Everything List <[email protected]> wrote: No, its not a psychological thing. A psychological thing would be avoidence, as in ignoring what people say and do and just going with "a feeling." This is years of observing the actions of "your" side. It's purely, observing speeches and behavior, and borrowing from old, Claude Shannon (who worked for the OSS from 1942-45) you observe what people say to each other, of their own persuasion, and also what they do not say. For example, in my country, there is now a big scandal, that the president and his loyal press cannot bury. Specifically, it's the use of auditing conservative groups, using the US IRS, and never, not once, auditing liberal groups; and this by the admission of the heads of the IRS. Its' the use of the FBI, deliberately, ordered to spy on a "conservative" report for Fox. It's the enormous expansion of the NSA and its spying capabilities, It's also the spiking of news by all the presidents' loyal press, which gets first reported on, say, Fox, and then after the elections, the news comes out anyways, because they can no longer look good to themselves, psychologically. What I am speaking about is the Benghazi cover up, which got 4 people killed, when our fearless leader could have saved them. Motivations for not acting? Military action would weakened support from his fellow, lib voters, for the 2012 election, and also, and this is just my guess, he was rocking the ganj in the whitehouse with some girfriend. Look to Michelle's quietude, to Hillary Clinton's quietude, to Jacqueline Kennedy's quietude on marital dalliances, as a solid history. I suppose sex in the whitehouse has some charm for some women. My point is BHO didn't want to be bothered, and for months "his press" shilled for him. Oh, that's right! Liberals are the good guys, you care about people, because you're so willing to use other people's money, so you can "feel" better. Yeah. I see... you seem to feel that because you "think" most "liberals" <or insert whatever label here> are this way or that that this "gut feeling" of yours gives you the right to make statements about me, which you have no way of knowing the truth of. What a brilliant stretch of reasoning. Seriously do you just pull stuff out of your-you-know-where...pin it on people who do not share your particular world view and call it a day? Do you have starch for brains... are you really that much of a potato head? You force me to admit that maybe Kim was onto something. Chris -----Original Message----- From: 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List <[email protected]> To: everything-list <[email protected]> Sent: Tue, Jun 24, 2014 7:46 pm Subject: Re: American Intelligence From: spudboy100 via Everything List <[email protected]> To most "liberals/progressive/Marxists" is a wet dream, a fantasy come true for them. The "boi" thing is nice and I wish I thought of it. People are not xenophobic, if they actually have world, idiots actively seeing you go bye bye, Since the baddies have won the last US election, its their world now. However, I still suspect an X crossing Y point in the US, not went the 53% get angry, but when the 47% feels they have had enough. As far as who to like and hate in the world, there's nothing stopping any nationalist from working together on important trade, and technical pursuits. Race is no big deal as we are all related, seemingly, but, now, cultures are a waaaay, different thing, because it conveys who one identifies with, and what one values. That's where things are more nuanced. But even here, if the rewards are great enough, we can have enough incentive, for people to work together. But not if they're out to cut one's throat. Where have I ever said that a destabilized America is to my liking? Never said anything remotely suggesting that. Does spudboi mean "xenophobic potato head" perchance? I see... you seem to feel that because you "think" most "liberals" <or insert whatever label here> are this way or that that this "gut feeling" of yours gives you the right to make statements about me, which you have no way of knowing the truth of. What a brilliant stretch of reasoning. Seriously do you just pull stuff out of your-you-know-where...pin it on people who do not share your particular world view and call it a day? Do you have starch for brains... are you really that much of a potato head? You force me to admit that maybe Kim was onto something. Chris -----Original Message----- From: 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List <[email protected]> To: everything-list <[email protected]> Sent: Tue, Jun 24, 2014 3:37 pm Subject: Re: American Intelligence From: spudboy100 via Everything List <[email protected]> >>This will likely bring some sort of conflict, I am guessing. However, a >>destabilized, US, might be to your liking, emotionally, so as to fit your >>personal world view? In any case you can test out your national friendships >>with China, Russia, Iran, and maybe, ISIS? (That's a great name for a >>group-Ian Fleming couldn't have done better!). Where have I ever said that a destabilized America is to my liking? Never said anything remotely suggesting that. Does spudboi mean "xenophobic potato head" perchance? Hopefully others will realize that Americans are not all like you spudboi, for you -- and your ilk - are the inspiration for a lot of the negative stereotypes people have formed about America. Enjoy life a little potato head; stop being so tiresomely predictable. Chris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
