We do not need a mathematical proof that before there was anything anywhere, there was nothing.
According to my model of our Universe, everything in our Universe is made from an equal number of plus and minus tronnies. The only property of tronnies is their charge of plus or minus e. Tronnies have no mass. The sum of all tronnies is zero (i.e. nothing). Tronnies get their charges from Coulomb grids that completely fill our Universe. Coulomb grids are comprised of plus and minus speed of light Coulomb waves that also add to zero. Coulomb force waves are the product of tronnies and tronnies are the product of Coulomb force waves, all of which add to zero, nothing. However, our current Universe was not made from nothing. It was made from the recycling of our predecessor Universe most of which was pulled by the gravity of a Monster Black which exploded in the Big Bang which created our Universe. I have guessed that our Universe is Universe 47 in a series of universes. I have also guessed that the mass of the universes in this series of universes doubles with each cycle and that the first universe was the size of our galaxy. In the very beginning before there was anything there must have been nothing, a complete vacuum, empty space. I don’t know how but somehow at least a portion of that empty space became occupied by tronnies or Coulomb force waves (either one), because Coulomb force waves are continually produced by tronnies and tronnies are point focuses of Coulomb force waves that extend out from the tronnies at the speed of light forever. Three tronnies make an electron or a positron. (There are an equal number of electrons and positrons in every universe, so they also add to zero.) Two tronnies make an entron. (The two tronnies of every entron and all entrons, taken as a group, also add to zero.) Photons are merely entrons traveling forward at the speed of light. Entrons provide all of the mass of universes other than that provided by electrons and positrons, which are produce and destroyed only in pairs. An electron and a neutrino entron and two positrons make a naked proton. The naked proton collects gamma ray entrons to make nuclei of hydrogen atoms. Hydrogen atoms are fused in stars to make alpha particles and all of the atoms in the periodic table can be made from alpha particles, electrons and gamma ray entrons. Black Holes produce gravity by consuming portions of its galaxy and/or other galaxies and destroying protons to release their neutrino entrons which escape from the Black Holes to provide galactic gravity. Near the center of each universe, as the universe ages a Monster Black Hole will form which will ultimately consume substantially all of the Universe with its ever increasing gravity. Toward the end of the life of the universe galaxies from near the outer edges of the universe will be accelerated toward the Monster Black Hole at thousands of times the speed of light. The Monster Black Hole will explode in a Big Bang and the last remaining Black Holes will pass through the site of the Big Bang to produce the inflation of the successor universe. John Ross From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of meekerdb Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 9:26 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: A Mathematical Proof That The Universe Could Have Formed Spontaneously From Nothing On 6/24/2014 7:34 PM, LizR wrote: This has a few interesting corollaries, ISTM. 1. It hints that there might be a way to distinguish the pilot wave interpretation of QM from the rest, which could be handy I doubt that since Bohmian QM is just another way of writing Schrodinger's equation. Bohm gave it a certain interpretation different from Bohr's, but mathematically they must be the same. Brent 2. It hints at eternal inflation (the second bit of support for this in the last few months, assuming the BICEP results stand up). EI gives rise to a "Level 1" multiverse which makes the MWI's multiverse redundant, in a sense. 3. It DOESN'T explain how the universe formed spontaneously from nothing, however! It explains how a patch of false vacuum or whatever which obeys the Wheeler-deWitt equation could have generated an expanding space-time, and given 2. there is no need for anything to appear from nothing - we have a steady state cosmos, on the largest scale. On 25 June 2014 12:44, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List <[email protected]> wrote: Interesting synopsis of a paper on http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.1207 -- don't have access though -- so here is the write up. Not sure if this has already been discussed here or not. A Mathematical Proof That The Universe Could Have Formed Spontaneously From Nothing <https://medium.com/the-physics-arxiv-blog/ed7ed0f304a3> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
