On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 4:55 PM, John Mikes <[email protected]> wrote:
> Liz: > can't you get out of the reilgious obsession? Does EVERYTHING not include > more exciting (and maybe closer, to solvable) topics? > John Mikes > Ok, but that would be your religion, John :-) I think Liz's post is not only modest and funny: It could also be a challenge to play a game, we could call "beliefwise", with the objective of answering fictionally: What is more poisonous (i.e. property of forcing acceleration of processes with high degree of consistency, chemical or otherwise, including power, use leading to eventually death, but medicine when used judiciously) or "drug-like" than human or machine set of beliefs? Beliefwise can we tell in some fictional universe: a) the good from the bad b) whether they matter or not assuming for one moment that we do not allow the move: "Moi? But why... my beliefs aren't simply beliefs... they are as true, as I live and stand here! A lifetime of proof!" and we, for humors' sake, only write about people/machines in third person, that may or may not have anything to do with us, but we play nice? Taking it slow and easy? Like flexing some creative muscle instead of talking about it? I'd be game, but would certainly not want to play alone. It might be a junk creative writing algorithm though, so if you can better or indeed smash it, please do :-) All or nada (not the Croatian, but the Spanish, Portuguese meaning)! PGC -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
