On 23 July 2014 05:15, John Ross <[email protected]> wrote: > Symmetry > > Every proton contains one electron and two positrons. There is one > electron for each proton. There exists a relatively few free positrons > and there is a free electron to match each free positrons. Electrons and > positrons are created and destroyed only in pairs. So there is exactly the > same number of positrons in our Universe as electrons. It is as simple as > that. There is no asymmetry in my theory. >
Forgive me but I think you have missed the point. There is an observed asymmetry in nature - there are far more electrons than positrons, and far more protons than antiprotons. Your theory, very admirably, reduces the fundamental components of matter to two (I think) - and these exist in equal numbers, overall - but there is still an asymmetry in how they are *arranged*. That is, your theory needs to explain the observed fact that the universe is mainly made of (what we call) matter rather than antimatter. Why do tronnies prefer to form electrons and protons rather than electrons and positrons, for example? Or to put it in tronnie terms, why are there far more occasions where two positrons and one electron have formed a proton than there are where two electrons and one positron have formed an anti-proton? The physics involved in both these processes should be symmetrical, so each should be equally likely. Yet clearly something caused vastly more protons to form than anti-protons. Why is this? To have credibility, your theory needs to address this observed property of the universe. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
