On Wed, Sep 3, 2014  'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List <
[email protected]> wrote:

>a human baby is a plastic template for the individual to emerge in
>

And those 1000 lines of Lisp are a plastic template for the Jupiter Brain
to emerge in.


> All of that living experience and cultural learning is not contained
> inside that DNA bundle.
>

Obviously. And everything the adult Jupiter Brain knows wasn't contained in
those 1000 lines of Lisp, but that was the seed that got things going.


> I disagree with your conclusion that epigenetic effects are of minor
> consequence.
>

Are you saying that random environmental conditions in the womb are
necessary to build a brain? I don't see how that could work but a machine
has just as much access to the environment as a fetus. Or are you saying
the conditions are not random at all but planned and deliberate? Well, I
don't believe in God.


> The very rapid unfolding sequence of DNA choreographed events that occurs
> during embryogenesis will unfold in a different manner in each instance.
>

DNA doesn't fold or unfold, the most it does is during reproduction when it
temporally turns from a double helix to 2 single helices which soon turn
into 2 double helices. It's protein that's the champion folder and the same
sequence of amino acids always fold into the same shape under all lifelike
conditions; it's a good thing too because if the way proteins wasn't
consistent and reliable life would be impossible.

>  It is an extra mechanism that works hand I hand with DNA  switching
> expression on and off… selecting from alternate exressions.
>

Yes, but computer code has been doing that, switching subroutines on and
off, for more than 60 years.  Tell me something of fundamental importance
that meat can do but silicon can't.


> > how these regions finally get transcribed into mRNA, in what is a highly
> dynamic process


And when a Lisp program gets run it's a a highly dynamic process. Tell me
something of fundamental importance that meat can do but silicon can't.


>> So the key to consciousness and the factor that determines our personal
>> identity lies in our poo?
>>
> > If you want to characterize your digestive process by what is defecated
> out as waste I think you must not have a good grasp of what the digestive
> process is all about. It is our primary interface with the external world.
> It is the interface where we absorb the external world into our bodies
> internal world. It even has its own tiny frontline brain – the enteric
> nervous system.
>

So I guess the answer to my question is yes.

>  >>> It affects out well-being
>>
> >> So would an inflamed toenail, but I don't think a investigation of that
>> affliction will bring much enlightenment on the nature of intelligence or
>> consciousness.
>>
>
> > Apples and oranges
>

are both trees.

> Just because one tool – reductionism has had spectacular success in
> increasing our understanding (and I am not denying that it has) does not
> mean that it is always the appropriate tool to use for the job.
>
Reductionism may not always work but holism NEVER works.

  John K Clark

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to