Hi Chris, Could we discuss this further outside of the group?
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 11:07 PM, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List < [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Stephen Paul King > *Sent:* Monday, September 01, 2014 5:38 PM > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: AI Dooms Us > > > > Hi Chris, > > > > I agree. What we see in the current development is, literally, > evolution - I would not say that it is "Darwinian" per se as it is not > smooth or continuous. It looks more like a punctuated equilibrium over many > interacting asynchronous systems. What I don't see is an analogue of a > genome, such that the Dawkins model is supported. > > > > I just recently found talks on "dependency injection". Please tell me more! > > > > Also known as inversion of control. Essentially it involves the > implementation of interfaces. The interface being the contract. How the > service implementing the contract goes about doing so is an internal > matter, what matters to the client is that the contract is honored and the > given service is performed. Complex systems are assemblages of simpler > systems… file systems, data repositories, messaging systems, and so on. > These systems can be composited together using interfaces and abstract > containers – instead of returning a concrete container of something the > thing can return something (could be anything) that fulfills a shared > contract. > > Late binding dependency injection is a means of supplying at the late > deployed run time phase of a configured set of libraries… perhaps behind > other endpoints and so forth that will implement the required interface and > provide the needed service. The consuming program need not worry about how > a given dependency will be fulfilled – that is the injected libraries > responsibility. > > Using a combination of programming behind the abstraction of interfaces > and IOC containers – frameworks that perform late binding dependency > injection to fulfill the service needs a program can free itself from any > particular implementation and smoothly evolve to other better > implementations as long as its contracts i.e. defined implemented > interfaces can be fulfilled. > > > > On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 8:32 PM, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Stephen Paul King > *Sent:* Monday, September 01, 2014 2:53 PM > > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: AI Dooms Us > > > > Hi Chris, > > > > A colleague of mine has found a few possible examples of > "self-assembling code" but they are not strings of bits, they are better > described as a form of topological object. They are based on a different > model of computation: > > http://chorasimilarity.wordpress.com/2014/09/01/quines-in-chemlambda/ > > > > software systems increasingly are becoming comprised of services (making > use of other services (that call into other services (etc.))) In the > ecosystem of cloud facing services those that are performant etc. will tend > to rise and become incorporated – often, increasingly in a late binding > manner, through a process called dependency injection – into other > assemblies of multiple different services and internal logic that > increasingly are themselves becoming exposed as yet other services. > > Meta systems, comprised of loosely coupled archipelagos of distinct areas > of responsibility and roles linked together in the cloud through dynamic > queues are taking off. Large systems such as say Netflix heavily rely on > this architecture. > > IMO – this is an architecture in which a form of digital Darwinian > evolution can more easily occur – as compared with traditionally > application models -- with the services being the organisms and the cloud > being the ecosystem. As the adoption of dependency injection models > increases and systems become more late bound with the better exemplars of > specific services (say logging, monitoring and alarming for example) > becoming injected into live systems (often without even needing to bring > them down) best of breed pressures will begin to drive the service > organisms to evolve into becoming more effective and better options. > > > > On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 2:45 PM, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *John Clark > *Sent:* Monday, September 01, 2014 9:43 AM > > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: AI Dooms Us > > > > On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 3:18 PM, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Just want to point out that the process of DNA expression is highly > dynamic and is multi-factored > > > > Yes it certainly is, but however dynamic the DNA information is it's still > just 750 meg (actually it's much less than that considering the massive > amount of redundancy in our genome). And Telmo's 1000 lines of lisp would > also have to be highly dynamic. > > > > Amazing isn’t it. The elegance of self-assembling processes that can do so > much with so little input. I doubt 1000 lines of computer code is a large > enough initial instruction set even for a highly self-generating system. > Maybe a few million lines of code might do it though, if it was code that > generated other code and so forth in a cascading process similar to > embryogenesis in eukaryotes. > > > The mammalian genomes undergo very extensive genomic reprogramming > during embryogenesis. > > > > And where did the information about how to do that reprogramming come > from? From the original 750 meg. > > > > Much of it did certainly. But it also comes from the environment… e.g. > from an external source. The outcome of embryogenesis is affected by > epigenetic influences that alter what genetic information is expressed and > also crucially when (at what point in sequences of expression) it occurs. > This external epigenetic programming instructions are completely outside of > that original bundle of genetic information. > > > > > > This is especially so during the process of embryogenesis, an unfolding > developmental choreographed switching process that is controlled by > epigenetic programming (methylation /demethylation and other mechanisms). > > > Methylation means that occasionally a Methyl group might be added to one > of the DNA bases, a base would have a Methyl group or it would not so it's > still digital. There are 4 bases so AT MOST each of the 3 billion bases > would represent 3 bits instead of 2, so the information content would > increase from 750 Meg to 1.12 Gig and with a file compression program like > ZIP you could still fit all of it on a CD. > > But the fact is that the epigenetic external information is not available > until run-time. It exists outside the organism in its environment. > > But in reality Epigenetic information is pretty clearly of minor > importance compared with the DNA sequence information, so I doubt it would > even cause it to increase to 751 Meg. And the evidence that Epigenetic > heredity exists for more than one generation is very meager. > > > > I do not agree that the understanding and quantification of epigenetic > influences on human development (especially during embryogenesis) is as > settled or of minor consequence as you state. There is evidence for example > that it persists for three generations in studies of cigarette smokers > progeny, and I have read studies that point to high stress in one > generation resulting in epigenetic hereditary outcomes in subsequent > generations. Even identical twins as they grow and live through their > different lives – even their originally identical DNA diverges in its > expressed outcome due to epigenetic affects. > > > DNA is not a direct single layered – single meaning -- instruction set > encoded and fixed. > > > > You can assign as many layers of meaning on it as you like but nothing can > change the fact that you could put all the information in the entire human > DNA genome on a old fashioned CD and still have enough room on it for a > Beatles album from 1965. > > > > And 32 or so fundamental values define (fix, quantify) all the laws of our > universe. Amazing complexity can emerge from simple initial conditions. > > > > > The same strand of DNA, depending on the dynamic action of the large > number of transcription factors > > > > A transcription factors is just a protein that binds to specific DNA > sequences. And where did the information come from to know what sequence of > amino acids will build that very important protein? From the original 750 > Meg of course. > > From that original bundle of genetic code + environmental influences. 90% > of the living things in a human body DO NOT have human DNA (not by weight > of course but by census)… our behavior, our desires, our decisions, our > thoughts, dreams, cravings, fears… our volition… is at least in part being > driven by these other non-human organisms (especially the huge diverse > community of microorganisms living in our guts). > > The kind of flora and fauna we have in our guts in many ways determines > who we are, what we think and what we desire. It affects out well-being (or > lack of it), our emotions and our goals. This genetic information is not > part of the human DNA, but humans have coevolved with these communities of > microorganisms and many of them play important (perhaps vital) roles in our > Darwinian fitness. > > The information that triggers a whole slew of affects resulting in a > changed outcome for the organism could very well have originated in some > microorganism inhabiting that individuals gut. Our immune system especially > seems to have co-evolved to work symbiotically with many different species > of microorganisms. > > We require a vast library of CDs to live healthy lives…. Not just our DNA > CD, but all the DNA CDs of the thousands of organisms that a healthy human > animal requires (or greatly benefits from having within them). We are not > isolated organisms apart from the many other cohabitating organisms that > journey through life living inside our bodies. > > > It is – IMO – necessary to understand DNA as [...] > > > > I'm not saying that understanding how 750 Meg of DNA information manages > to produce a human being will be easy, figuring out how Telmo's 1000 lines > of lisp works will not be easy either, but I am saying that's all the > information there is. > > John K Clark > > > > I agree that it is amazingly compact. We may differ on where we draw the > line. I do not see a single human (or other eukaryote) only in terms of its > own DNA + epigenetic meta-programming over the DNA base, but also in terms > of the ecosystem that exists within. Both the beneficial and the parasitic > species within us hugely affect our lives – as they do with every > multi-cellular species we know about. > > We are walking talking ecosystems with biotic auras as unique as > fingerprints (in fact forensic science is beginning to study this as a > potential investigative tool) > > -Chris > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/everything-list/YJeHJO5dNqQ/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > > > > -- > > Kindest Regards, > > Stephen Paul King > > Senior Researcher > > Mobile: (864) 567-3099 > > [email protected] > > http://www.provensecure.us/ > > > “This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of > the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain > information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential and > exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may be constituted as > attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are > hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of > this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > message in error, notify sender immediately and delete this message > immediately.” > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/everything-list/YJeHJO5dNqQ/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > > > > -- > > Kindest Regards, > > Stephen Paul King > > Senior Researcher > > Mobile: (864) 567-3099 > > [email protected] > > http://www.provensecure.us/ > > > “This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of > the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain > information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential and > exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may be constituted as > attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are > hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of > this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > message in error, notify sender immediately and delete this message > immediately.” > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/everything-list/YJeHJO5dNqQ/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Kindest Regards, Stephen Paul King Senior Researcher Mobile: (864) 567-3099 [email protected] http://www.provensecure.us/ “This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may be constituted as attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, notify sender immediately and delete this message immediately.” -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
