On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > It seems to me that the MGA makes the robust/non-robustness irrelevant. What creates ambiguity is to not know where somebody, from you to everybody on the list here, is talking from. I know the system in place is to relate by referring to the steps, but why not answer with an answer that is used in so many textbook/paper, that it must be robustly, consistently true forever? We can apply this kind of solution even to measure problem, to which, and I quote thousands of textbooks here, "the answer is trivial and is left as an exercise for the reader." PGC -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
