That sounds interesting. What is it?

On 30 September 2014 14:46, spudboy100 via Everything List <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> Sent from AOL Mobile
> Leonardo probably did that some kind of generational spaceship. Just
> haven't uncovered it yet. I suppose my point is that I don't think it'll
> take too much longer historically speaking for us to even decide that we're
> alone or that life is Pluripotent, everywhere. Maybe only 100 years will
> human species decide if this is valid or not? If life seems abundant
> everywhere,  I suspect that will be a great drive for human species, and
> it's artificial intelligence companions to investigate this new realm of
> life. The answer is that the nearer universe, at least, appears to be dead,
> appears to be the bereft of life, I feel we will turn inwards.
>
>  If We remain a sophisticated civilization, we should be able to leave
> space exploration for the robots, until such a time and and place where we
> uncover something dynamically interesting. But this is for another
> generation to decide, and not ours. Which makes things,  seem, our world,
> our times, our worries, seem so temporary. On the other hand I am now
> reading the work by Clement Vidal, of Free University, Brussels, a
> colleague, of Bruno Marchal, on the meaning and purpose of intelligence,
> life, and cosmology, leading to the far future-a very, different
> perspective indeed.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: LizR <[email protected]>
> To: everything-list <[email protected]>
> Sent: Mon, Sep 29, 2014 05:02 PM
> Subject: Re: Handedness of biochemicals may have an origin in the weak
> nuclear force
>
>
>   Hmm. "God's quarantine regulations" in action?
>
>  According to "Rare Earth" you may need a lot of Goldilocks stuff to work
> out for life to exist. But I'd imagine something unicellular could get
> going in a lot of environments that wouldn't support multicellular life,
> and multicellular could get going in lots of places that wouldn't support
> technologically advanced species, and so on. But a centauri is a triple
> star and barnard's is an M type dwarf IIRC, neither may be as suitable as a
> single G or K type. Maybe Tau Ceti would be a better bet, admittedly a bit
> further to go (5 light years further IIRC!) But those AIs are patient. Also
> there's the possibility of getting small space ships that don't require
> life support up to relativistic speeds with antimatter or a light sail. I'd
> be happy to wait 50 years for news from another star,
>  while 500 is pushing it a bit. (Shame Leonardo didn't invent a generation
> starship...)
>
>
>  On 30 September 2014 10:51, spudboy100 via Everything List <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>  They will have the same chirality, if they exist. It seems inordinately,
> maddening, if no other life exits, however, maybe if we don't (assuming
> there's still a human species) find bacterial life in 100 years, our
> descendants, will give up. Best guess? A AI probe to centauri and barnards
> star. If sophisticated scans prove zippo, the natural thing to do is to
> turn inward. For everyone but astronomy AI's, the stars will just be
> little lights in the skies. The universe, an empty darkness.
>
>
>   -----Original Message-----
> From: LizR < [email protected]>
> To: everything-list < [email protected]>
> Sent: Sat, Sep 27, 2014 3:33 am
> Subject: Handedness of biochemicals may have an origin in the weak nuclear
> force
>
>
> http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/weak-nuclear-force-shown-to-give-asymmetry-to-biochemistry-of-life/
>
>  This possibly implies that most life in the universe may have similar
> chirality...?
>    --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to