On 19 November 2014 06:45, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/18/2014 5:00 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 17 Nov 2014, at 21:13, meekerdb wrote: > > On 11/17/2014 2:55 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > The bible explains better (if we assume it is correct) > > > And if it isn't correct it doesn't explain anything. Which is why science > seeks to test correctness prior to explanatory power. > > > Ideally, or FAPP, perhaps. > > But fundamentally, science cannot test correctness, not even define it > properly. > > > Are you saying that a theory cannot be tested an found incorrect?? > > I would think the obvious way to parse what Bruno has said here is "science cannot show that something is correct".
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
