On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 3:55 AM, John Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 Telmo Menezes <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I would say the point here is not so much that we need to transcend >> Darwinism in the sense that the theory is insufficient, but because >> evolution has "other plans" for the machinery that we use to do science. >> The idea that being a good scientist is maladaptive. So we would need to >> literally transcend Darwinism. >> > > It happens all the time, the man who invented the condom transcend > Darwinism. > I disagree. We are all still all the product of Darwinist processes. We are all at the end of a long line of machines that successfully produced viable offspring. The condom is just a recent change in reproductive strategies. Changes in reproductive strategies have been happening since the first life-forms appeared. Telmo. > > John K Clark > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
