On 28 Jan 2015, at 19:43, John Clark wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
> Note that a theory which would requires nature to exploit infinite
precision would entail the falsity of computationalism.
Yes, and if the theory was correct it would also prove that the Real
Numbers are really real.
Aaaaaaaaaaaaah.... Really real does mean for you "primary physical".
So you do assume, in your theory a primary physical universe. In some
post you seemed open that this might not be the case.
Bruno
John K Clark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
