On 28 Jan 2015, at 10:55, LizR wrote:
I must admit I am a little suspicious of a theory that requires
nature to exhibit infinite precision.
Note that a theory which would requires nature to exploit infinite
precision would entail the falsity of computationalism.
The apparent existence of evolution is a strong evidence in favor of
computationalism, alias digital mechanism. The precisions added by
molecular genetics gave even more evidences.
We might say that the evolution of life is an evidence that nature
exploits computationalism since the start.
Of course it is not a proof (in which theory?) that computationalism
is true.
Bruno
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
