On 4/15/2015 5:33 PM, LizR wrote:
On 15 April 2015 at 05:40, John Clark <johnkcl...@gmail.com <mailto:johnkcl...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Telmo Menezes <te...@telmomenezes.com
    <mailto:te...@telmomenezes.com>> wrote:

            >> My problem with any view based on entropy is that entropy 
doesn't appear to be fundamental to
            physics; it is the statistically likely result when objects are put 
in a
            certain configuration and allowed to evolve randomly.


        > There is, however, an interesting parallel to be made with Shannon's 
entropy, which is a measure of
        information content and not just a statistical effect. Once in the 
realm of
        digital physics, it becomes questionable if physical entropy and 
information
        entropy are separate things.


    I think the second law of thermodynamics is the most fundamental law of 
physics, in
    fact it's almost a law of logic rather than physics; entropy will always 
increase
    just says that there are more ways to be complicated than simple, so any 
change in a
    system will probably make it more complicated and not simpler. Or to put it 
in
    Shannon's language, it takes more information to describe a complicated 
thing than a
    simple thing.

This is my point - it is not a law of physics, it's a law of logic.

To be exact, the second law will almost certainly exist in any universe with any laws of physics that allow for the existence of complex structures, bound systems, etc.

The second law depends on approximation and ignorance as well as complexity. If the laws of physics are deterministic and time-symmetric (as MWI advocates suppose) then the second law works because we never have perfect information (and often we don't even want to use all the information we have; we're happy with an approximation) so from the information we have we can only predict statistical regularities. From a Copenhagen perspective QM prevents us from ever having complete information of the state and so we only have statistical prediction and retrodiction.

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to