On 4/27/2015 10:25 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2015-04-27 19:18 GMT+02:00 meekerdb <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>: On 4/27/2015 1:35 AM, LizR wrote:I think it goes without saying that the whole enterprise is mainly driven by the profit motive (although of course there have been significant injections from other areas, little things like the internet!) But the profit motive requires that people keep buying, and that requires that computers (in all their forms) continue to improve, since they don't tend to wear out THAT quickly.Then why can't I buy a laptop with as big a display (1920x1200) as my five year old HP. Maybe because you can buy laptop with better display, like 4k resolution... http://www.toshiba.com/us/p50tAnd maybe because a lot of new things are done with mobile devices... there are phones that will have 4k display next year...
But having twice the resolution on a smaller screen is worthless. My HP has a 17" screen and 1920x1200 is plenty of resolution for my old eyes. Going to a 15.6" screen with 3840x2160 is NOT an improvement (to say nothing having to use Windoze 8.1). If they're going to make 3840x2160 graphics they should put them on the bigger screens, not the smaller ones!?
Brent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
