Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 4 May 2015 at 14:38, LizR <lizj...@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes. I've mentioned occasionally that if the substitution level is quantum,
then no-cloning may be a problem, at least in principle. The usual answer is
that the subst level is WAY above quantum - that our experiences and hence
the famous "observer moments" aren't anywhere near to the Planck time or
length.
If the substitution level is quantum then no-cloning may be a problem
in practice, but not in principle.
??
The no-cloning theorem would rule out quantum level substitution *in
principle* as far as I can tell.
Bruce
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
