Quentin Anciaux wrote:


2015-05-04 9:26 GMT+02:00 Bruce Kellett <bhkell...@optusnet.com.au <mailto:bhkell...@optusnet.com.au>>:

    Stathis Papaioannou wrote:

        On 4 May 2015 at 17:14, Bruce Kellett <bhkell...@optusnet.com.au
        <mailto:bhkell...@optusnet.com.au>> wrote:


            The initial point that we were making was that copying at
            the quantum level
            of substitution is not possible, in principle. Accidental
            copies in another
            universe are not "deliberate but surreptitious" copies. They
            are irrelevant
            to the argument.


        You implied that if you did not know about the copy because it
        was not
        prepared deliberately that would make a difference, but I don't see
        why it should.


    The point of Step 3, as I understand it, is that we know the set-up:
    we know that we are to be copied at the appropriate substitution
    level and duplicated -- at two different locations. Chance
    duplicates do not fit the criteria and are irrelevant to the comp
    hypothesis.


It's a though experiment... so the duplicates do fit the criteria by definition.. you even gave it here "we are to be copied at the appropriate substitution level and duplicated"... step 0 again, is that it is possible... so, if you reject step 0, there is no point to use that as an argument against further steps... you already have rejected the premiss, so any deductive steps based on it have already been rejected by you as you reject step 0.

The point being made is that deliberate copying at the quantum level is impossible in principle. That is what is required for "yes doctor" at step 0, so the whole argument collapses if the substitution level has to be that low. The argument only has a chance of going through is that if the appropriate substitution level is classical, and capable of accurate digital simulation. Anything else and comp fails to get off the ground.

Now I am not saying that quantum level substitution is necessary, just that *if it is', the argument fails.

Bruce

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to