On 5/4/2015 11:18 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 04 May 2015, at 15:08, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 1:08 PM, spudboy100 via Everything List
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I sure did, Telmo. Scroll to the bottom and you shall view my last, number
26th,
the last one.
Ah there you are! And you are not the only one from this list commenting there, it's a
small world.
My bet on computational after-lives is that we are in one already (an infinity of
times), but this is completely transparent to us.
This kind of thing is interesting to me. I tend toward the materialist
stuff since
it seems to have potential. The mentalist stuff seems unreliable because
people who
have NDE's or trances have not come back with information.
I would say that the important distinction is between communicable and non-communicable
stuff. Science is about communicable stuff, but there is personal value in exploring
the internal world -- although it won't get you a nobel prize or even any sort of
recognition.
This is because there is no Nobel Prize in Mathematics (not mentioning
Theology).
But you can have the Nobel prize of literature, and some text does indeed quasi-succeed,
perhaps, in communication a bit of the uncommunicable. Then you can communicate a part
conditionally, like if I am consistent then I can't justify that I am consistent, and
the inetnsional variants.
Bruno
You can get a Templeton, which is for merging science and religion and is worth more than
a Nobel.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
