On 6 May 2015 at 14:34, spudboy100 via Everything List < [email protected]> wrote:
> Much of the nobel committees even for physics and chemistry seem biased, > and subjective. Templeton, is for scientists with intellectual and > spiritual leanings, Nobel is best left to academic scientists who tow the > socialist line, and are nicely rewarded. Are all career academics like > that? No, but not making waves while obtaining government grants, goes a > long way to get along, and go along career wise. > > So you're saying Templeton is less biased and subjective? I'm not disagreeing, I just want to know what you think. I don't know much about either of them. (And what was that about 100F summers?) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
