On 5/5/2015 5:27 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:


On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:12 AM, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net <mailto:meeke...@verizon.net>> wrote:

    On 5/4/2015 2:54 PM, LizR wrote:
    On 5 May 2015 at 00:12, Telmo Menezes <te...@telmomenezes.com
    <mailto:te...@telmomenezes.com>> wrote:

        On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 1:03 PM, LizR <lizj...@gmail.com
        <mailto:lizj...@gmail.com>> wrote:

            Yes, very. I haven't read the paper yet but I hope when they say 
you pay
            for votes that isn't meaning a plutocracy, but from some share of 
equally
            distributed "voting capital" or something similar? So people can 
spend
            their voting power on whatever they're concerned about?


        The idea is very simple. You can buy x votes for (x * c)^2 dollars. In 
the end,
        all the money that was spent on buying votes is equally distributed by 
the
        voters. So the more the plutocracy spends its financial capital to 
influence
        policy, the more wealth equality you get. The author proposes a 
mathematical
        proof that such a system would stabilize on an equal distribution of 
political
        power.

        Of course, there are many real world details that could make this idea 
fail
        miserably, but it's fun to think about.

    Yes, if it's real money being spent it's kind of similar to the current 
system, at
    least in countries where unlimited pre-election spending is allowed. A lot 
of the
    time the rich - who own the media and so on - buy the result they want, as 
per Mark
    Twain's comment.

    Where does the money go once it's bought votes?

    It's redistributed.  So after the Koch brothers spend $889,000,000 in the 
next
    election to cast 29,816 votes, each of the 129 million voters will get back 
$6.88
(plus the $1 they put in plus a share of whatever other big spenders put in). Actually I think the Bros will be better off buying attack ads with their billion.


Which is a better situation than we have now, where they can just buy the laws for much cheaper.

I'm not sure that's much cheaper. One way they buy votes is by funding attack ads against opponents of legislators they want a vote from. But if you're interested in "quadratic voting" you should read this

 http://rangevoting.org/MonetizedRV.html

by a Warren D. Smith.

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to