On 6 May 2015 at 08:38, John Mikes <jami...@gmail.com> wrote: > Quadratic, or not there are two things about voting: > > 1. The 'pre-WWII' Hungarian system (I am far from suggesting Hungary as a > good political pattern) with 2 lists per party: one of the districts and > one latent national for the leading names in the party. > EVERY VOTE COUNTS: if somebody gets within the District the fixed number > of votes for being elected, so be it and the excess goes to the national > list. If somebody does NOT get elected, all the votes (s)he got go onto the > national list, from where the names are considered one after the other as > the (pre)fixed number of votes accumulated for an election-need. > As I hear the system is still on. > > This is much superior than the Gerrymandered unjustice of the USA. > > 2. I do not approve a 'voting' of just "YES-men". There should be a way to > express a " N O " to the candidate, or proposal. > > What I completely disapprove is the Big Money influence on the voting. Any > candidate should get identical expense-money once fulfilled the conditions > of running lawfully and NO MORE from NO SOURCE. Give the voter a chance to > freely compare the proposals and make up their mind in the privacy of their > home. > Nobody should be inundated with ads etc. > > I agree with everything you say here.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
