On 5/18/2015 1:50 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:


On Tuesday, May 19, 2015, meekerdb <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    On 5/18/2015 10:22 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:

    What about Mister D. During his conference his brain completely melted down,
    disappeared, say, in this thought experience, but a lucky cosmic ray, by 
pure
    chance, will activate the exact motor's neurons, so that he will pursue his
    conference like if nothing happened. Once, an auditor interrupted him and 
asked a
    question, but Mister D was so lucky that at that moment the lucky ray sent, 
by pure
    chance, the "right" activation of the motor nerves. Note that Mister D as no
    inputs, no cortex, no lymbic system, no cerebral stem, as the lucky rays 
activates
    only the motor nerves.

    Is him a zombie? In this case the empty brain is as good as a normal brain. 
For the
    right 3p behavior, you need just the right impulse at the muscles.

    What if the brain does not melt down, but get dissociated and manages a 
dream,
    unrelated to the conference. Who would be Mister D from his (?) perspective?

It strikes me that these arguments based on extreme improbabilities are worthless. What difference would it make whether Mister D is conscious or not in a hypothetical
    that is so improbable as to never happen in the history of the universe?  
We could
    accept either answer.  It's like reasoning, "If pigs could fly, then..."


There is a difference in kind, not degree, between the impossible and the highly improbable.

I disagree. That's a platonic attitude that we can discriminate between impossible and highly improbable. It comes from a reliance on logical, in which contradictions are "impossible"; but in fact contradictions are properties of language and what we have thought "impossible" in the past based on language, we've found to be the case in fact and had to adjust our language to fit.

Brent

In ordinary life we can take them as equivalent, and do so multiple times a day without thinking about it, but not in philosophical discussions such as these.


--
Stathis Papaioannou
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to