On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Bruce Kellett <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 26/10/2015 3:48 pm, Jason Resch wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 11:05 PM, Bruce Kellett <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> The only sort of existence for which we have concrete evidence is >> physical existence. We can understand imaginary things, but we have no >> direct evidence for their existence -- certainly not for their physical >> existence. >> > > Do you acknowledge that we have no evidence that such things do not exist? > And therefore, we should at least remain agnostic on the idea rather than > reject the idea out of hand? > > > Imaginary things do not have physical existence. > Maybe things in our imaginations else elsewhere. > You can dream up some other kind of existence if you like, but you have no > evidence that any such notion has useful content. > I've posted on this before. Maybe you've missed them. > In this context, absence of evidence is evidence of absence. > > > I disagree. Not sure there's much more I can say. Jason -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
