On Sunday, 1 November 2015, Samiya Illias <[email protected]> wrote:
> For those interested in computationalism, and/or those with a Christian > background may find this interesting: > Virgin Birth > > *Abstract* > Virgin birth of Jesus is a matter of much debate. What we believe or not > is a matter of faith, and depends on how we read and interpret the > scripture(s). However, scientists have been studying parthenogenesis, the > term used to describe virgin birth. Though virgin birth has been widely > observed in nature, there are very few cases of experimental virgin birth > in mammals, and no known cases yet in the wild. Combining observed > phenomenon with emerging studies in Biophysics, and using analogies of > known computing and communication technology, we can try to comprehend and > appreciate the miracle of virgin birth. > > *Full Text*: http://signsandscience.blogspot.com/2015/10/virgin-birth.html > > > I don't see what this has to do with computationalism. And isn't it by far the simpler and more likely explanation that despite claims it wasn't actually a virgin birth? -- Stathis Papaioannou -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
