On 10/05/2016 5:00 pm, 'scerir' via Everything List wrote:
Bruno (I suppose) wrote:But in the MWI, some work needs to be done (at least) to convince me. I don't even find a paper on the subject, only paper which shows that MWI is local (some more rigorous than other). Do you have a reference of a paper showing that Bell's inequality violation entails non locality in the MWI? I would like to take a look on it, if it exists. ### W. Myrvold wrote something here http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/11654/ (see ch. 0.8)
It seems that he is saying that 'action-at-a-distance' is something that would violate the 'no-signalling theorem' of quantum mechanics. So he sees experimental violation of the Bell inequalities as evidence for non-locality, but not necessarily evidence for action-at-a-distance in the above sense. I would agree with his conclusion that both collapse and Everettian theories are like this -- non-local, but also non-signalling at spacelike separations.
Bruce -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
