On 23 Apr 2017, at 09:18, 'scerir' via Everything List wrote:
"Quentin Anciaux":
How can you justify logic from physics if logic is primary to prove
anything? You're building your lower layer upon an higher layer...
It's contradictory.
# David Finkelstein wrote interesting papers about the "physics of
logic" (and also about "introspective measurements")
streaming.ictp.trieste.it/preprints/P/68/035.pdf
That is a rather good introduction to quantum logic. Although I
disagree with Putnam and his idea that quantum mechanics makes logic
empirical. It shows that some logic are empirical, but as
computationalism illustrates, there are deep classical logical reason
why some logic are empirical, others are psychological, etc.
But Finkelstein is always very interesting and clear, it is a pleasure
to disagree with him. Logic is shown empirical here, but only in the
physicalist context.
Bruno
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
