On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 10:34:14AM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote: > Now, this does not necessarily concern us. I think. Even ZF and ZF > +Choice proves the same theorems in arithmetic. That is probably not > the case for ZF and ZF + CH, but the comp ontology will not change. > For the phenomenology, that might change something though, making > the measure problem more easy or more difficult. We are not yet > enough advanced on this to decide, i think. model theory and set > theory are *quite* complex compared to arithmetic! >
If comp ontology does not depend on CH (seems plausible), but there is an effect of phenomenology, then so much the worse for comp. Comp predicts that phenomenology is purely derivable from comp. However, I tend to agree with Saibal that things like the CH will prove irrelevant to phenomenology. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) Principal, High Performance Coders Visiting Senior Research Fellow hpco...@hpcoders.com.au Economics, Kingston University http://www.hpcoders.com.au ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
