On 26 Sep 2017, at 19:24, Brent Meeker wrote:



On 9/25/2017 6:37 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:

On 24 Sep 2017, at 21:02, smitra wrote:

On 23-09-2017 10:34, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 22 Sep 2017, at 13:47, David Nyman wrote:
https://www.quantamagazine.org/mathematicians-measure-infinities-find-theyre-equal-20170912/
[1]
A rare progress on the continuum hypothesis (CH). Shelah is amazingly
smart. There is that story that he arrived one week to early at a
congress of logic, and decided to follow a congress on group theory
instead, and depressed everybody by solving most open problems of that congress! His first question was "what is a group?", and people taught
he was retarted!
Now, this does not necessarily concern us. I think. Even ZF and
ZF+Choice proves the same theorems in arithmetic. That is probably not
the case for ZF and ZF + CH, but the comp ontology will not change.
For the phenomenology, that might change something though, making the
measure problem more easy or more difficult. We are not yet enough
advanced on this to decide, i think. model theory and set theory are
*quite* complex compared to arithmetic!
Bruno
Everything in physics suggests that infinities don't actually exists, so perhaps more progress can be made if you use a finitistic logics system.

That is the case for computationalism. It belongs to finitism. You can interpret all the infinities which appears at the phenomenological level as machine's inventions to study the finite realm. That is what I do actually in the math treatment.

In fact, contrary to what I have thought some years ago, it even admits an ultrafinist reading, although you need again some infinities at the meta-level to prove this. Computationalism is consistent with "there is a highest natural number". But no need of this to proceed, unless we met a genuine ultra-finitist (that is very rare!).

How can that work? In a finite system Goedel's theorem doesn't hold. Every proposition can be decided by exhaustive search.

Not at all. It is true that both PA and ZF cannot be finitely axiomatized, but RA can, and RA is already essentially undecidable. Gödel's theorem applies to RA. Some universal proposition (shape (x)P(x)) will not been decided by exhaustive search.

RA is not Löbian, i.e. RA itself cannot prove its own incompleteness. But is Gödelian.

Yet there are finitely axiomatizable system which are Löbian: the von- Neumann-Bernays Gödel set theory (the most powerful theory knows today in math, you can formalize Category theory in!) is Löbian, despite it *can* be finitely axiomatized.

Bruno








Brent


Note that you cannot invoke a God or a Physical Universe to decide what exists or not, or you beg the (metaphysical) question. Someone could say that everything in physics suggest that there is no physical reality existing per se, but only statistically interfering computations "seen from inside". Look how quick people like Bohr and Heisenberg were to abandon realism in physics. Fortunately Einstein and Everett were not that quick, and computationalism go in that same direction.

Bruno






Saibal
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to
[email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
[2].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout [3].
Links:
------
[1]
https://www.quantamagazine.org/mathematicians-measure-infinities-find-theyre-equal-20170912/
[2] https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
[3] https://groups.google.com/d/optout
[4] http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] .
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to