On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 1:38 AM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On 19 Jul 2013, at 20:30, John Clark wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Kermit Rose <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Is not the polarization of the photon the hidden variable that
>> determines the probability of the photon making it through the filter?
>
>
> That is what most people thought until experiments proved that simply
> cannot be the explanation because Bell's inequality is violated. And if
> that seems like a crazy way for the world to operate don't blame me blame
> God, I sent in a   resume but unfortunately Yahweh got the job.
>
> >> Even if Quantum Mechanics is someday proven to be untrue Bell's
>>> argument is still valid, in fact his original paper had no Quantum
>>> Mechanics in it;
>>>
>>
>> > Exactly.  This is why I am puzzled, and why I question the validity of
>> the Bell inequality.
>
>
> Bell proved that any system that obeys ANY theory that works by hidden
> variables MUST have certain properties; we find from experiment that the
> world does NOT have those certain properties, therefore the world CANNOT
> work by hidden variables and any theory that tries to use them, now or in
> the future, is going to fail. Quantum Mechanics does not work by hidden
> variables and that is one reason it has not failed.
>
> > his point was that any successful theory about the world must explain
>>> why his inequality is violated.
>>>
>>
>> > Does Quantum Mechanics explain why his inequality is violated?
>
>
> Nope, it predicts it but doesn't explain it,
>
>
> Contrary to computationalism which both predict and explain non locality,
> non cloning of matter, and indeterminacy. We will get there fter I have
> explained computability and provability, and the intensional nuance brought
> by incompleteness. But the UDA gives the intuition why it would be
> astonishing to get the Bell inequality not violated.
>
>
>
Bruno,

I was wondering if you could shed some light on how the UDA would lead one
to expect the violation of the Bell inequality.

Jason

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to