BTW, how is this [1] [2] intensionality, or contextuality, or wholeness, or undecidibility, or whatever - and related difficulties regarding the existence of "elements of reality" [3] - understandable within (postulates of) Quantum Mechanics (and especially within ontological interpretations like MWI)?
[1] https://arxiv.org/abs/0712.0921 [2] http://www.math.zju.edu.cn/wjd/notespapers/3-2.pdf [3] “”if, without in any way disturbing a system, we can predict with certainty (i.e., a probability equal to unity) the value of a physical quantity, then there exists an element of physical reality corresponding to this physical quantity.” ---EPR -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
